↓ Skip to main content

Baroreflex Activation Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,621)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
76 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Baroreflex Activation Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.02.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

William T. Abraham, Michael R. Zile, Fred A. Weaver, Christian Butter, Anique Ducharme, Marcel Halbach, Didier Klug, Eric G. Lovett, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen, Jill E. Schafer, Michele Senni, Vijay Swarup, Rolf Wachter, William C. Little

Abstract

The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of carotid BAT in advanced HF. Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity contribute to heart failure (HF) symptoms and disease progression. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) results in centrally mediated reduction of sympathetic outflow and increased parasympathetic activity. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III HF and ejection fractions ≤ 35% on chronic stable guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were enrolled at 45 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe. They were randomly assigned to receive ongoing GDMT alone (control group) or ongoing GDMT plus BAT (treatment group) for 6 months. The primary safety end point was system- and procedure-related major adverse neurological and cardiovascular events. The primary efficacy end points were changes in NYHA class, quality-of-life score, and 6-minute hall walk distance. One hundred forty-six patients were randomized, 70 to control and 76 to treatment. The major adverse neurological and cardiovascular event-free rate was 97.2% (lower 95% confidence bound 91.4%). Patients assigned to BAT, compared with control group patients, experienced improvements in the distance walked in 6 min (59.6 ± 14 m vs. 1.5 ± 13.2 m, p = 0.004), quality-of-life score (-17.4 ± 2.8 points vs. 2.1 ± 3.1 points, p < 0.001), and NYHA class ranking (p = 0.002 for change in distribution). BAT significantly reduced N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (p = 0.02) and was associated with a trend toward fewer days hospitalized for HF (p = 0.08). BAT is safe and improves functional status, quality of life, exercise capacity, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and possibly the burden of heart failure hospitalizations in patients with GDMT-treated NYHA class III HF. (Barostim Neo System in the Treatment of Heart Failure; NCT01471860; Barostim HOPE4HF (Hope for Heart Failure) Study; NCT01720160).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 245 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Master 23 9%
Other 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 73 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Engineering 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 86 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 595. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#39,243
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#5
of 1,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337
of 282,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.