↓ Skip to main content

Novelty without toxicity: a quest for a safer local anesthetic

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Novelty without toxicity: a quest for a safer local anesthetic
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12630-010-9409-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivian Hui Yun Ip, Ban C. H. Tsui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,391
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,338
of 110,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.