Title |
Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers of an endangered tropical tree, Sideroxylon majus, and cross-species amplification in other Sapotaceae species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12686-011-9437-0 |
Authors |
S. Dafreville, G. Payet, C. Simiand, A. M. Risterucci, E. Rivière, G. Lebreton, L. Humeau, D. Strasberg, M. H. Chevallier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 36% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 27% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,459,696
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#93
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,231
of 109,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them