↓ Skip to main content

HPV Vaccine and Latino Immigrant Parents: If They Offer It, We Will Get It

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
HPV Vaccine and Latino Immigrant Parents: If They Offer It, We Will Get It
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-015-0225-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham Aragones, Margaux Genoff, Cynthia Gonzalez, Elyse Shuk, Francesca Gany

Abstract

HPV vaccination rates remain low in the fast growing Latino children population while we continue to observe large HPV-associated cancer disparities in the Latino population. In this study, we sought to elucidate Latino immigrant parents' barriers to obtaining the HPV vaccine for their children. Five focus groups were conducted with Latino immigrant parents of minors (i.e., 9-17 year old) who had not yet initiated the HPV vaccine series. Three major findings were identified from the focus groups: (1) low levels of awareness and knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine, (2) high confidence that parent can get the vaccine for their eligible child and (3) lack of provider recommendation as the main barrier to vaccination. Children of Latino immigrant parents could benefit from increased provider recommendation for the HPV vaccine while providing tailored HPV information to parents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 35 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,526,058
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#123
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,150
of 328,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.