↓ Skip to main content

Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
333 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
523 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, February 2009
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2008.56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Dill

Abstract

This paper aims to provide insight on whether bicycling for everyday travel can help US adults meet the recommended levels of physical activity and what role public infrastructure may play in encouraging this activity. The study collected data on bicycling behavior from 166 regular cyclists in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area using global positioning system (GPS) devices. Sixty percent of the cyclists rode for more than 150 minutes per week during the study and nearly all of the bicycling was for utilitarian purposes, not exercise. A disproportionate share of the bicycling occurred on streets with bicycle lanes, separate paths, or bicycle boulevards. The data support the need for well-connected neighborhood streets and a network of bicycle-specific infrastructure to encourage more bicycling among adults. This can be accomplished through comprehensive planning, regulation, and funding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 493 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 162 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 19%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Researcher 43 8%
Other 18 3%
Other 69 13%
Unknown 78 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 128 24%
Engineering 99 19%
Environmental Science 60 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 5%
Sports and Recreations 18 3%
Other 95 18%
Unknown 97 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,250,243
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#57
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,815
of 184,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.