↓ Skip to main content

Theory in, theory out: NCSE and the ESS curriculum

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Theory in, theory out: NCSE and the ESS curriculum
Published in
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13412-015-0237-9
Authors

James D. Proctor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,974,124
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#365
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,102
of 279,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.