↓ Skip to main content

Alarming and increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among healthcare-associated infections in China: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alarming and increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among healthcare-associated infections in China: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
Published in
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jgar.2015.04.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Peng, Jing Shi, Tao Bu, Ying Li, Xiaohua Ye, Xiaofeng Chen, Zhenjiang Yao

Abstract

A number of studies have reported on the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) among healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in China; however, the exact rate of MDR-PA is unclear due to different definitions. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to explore the prevalence of MDR-PA among HAIs in China based on an international recommended standard. Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were systematically searched and papers published before February 2014 providing exact data on MDR-PA in the Chinese population were identified. Overall effects, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed using Stata v.13.0 software. Twenty-six studies were finally included. The overall prevalence of MDR-PA was 29.0% (95% confidence interval 24.6-33.4%). The rate of MDR-PA increased over time (P<0.001). The prevalence of MDR-PA was higher among patients in intensive care units (ICUs) (41.4%) than among non-ICU patients (24.1%) (P<0.001). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the prevalence of MDR PA in China and the findings suggest that MDR-PA should receive more attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
#335
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,671
of 280,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.