| Title |
Erfolgsquote bei Übungsfragen zum Fach Rheumatologie zur Vorbereitung auf das schriftliche Staatsexamen an deutschen Hochschulen von 2012 bis 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00393-018-0474-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Sengewein, R. Brinks, G. Pongratz |
| Abstract |
The discipline rheumatology is underrepresented in German universities with only seven professorial chairs with freedom of instruction. The teaching positions with and without freedom of instruction are associated with a different quantity of teaching. The effect of the teaching position on the quality of teaching and on the training of medical students is unclear. In order to approach the answer to this question we have evaluated 2,610,217 examination questions from 32,166 students over a time period of 4 years according to location and freedom of instruction, which are documented on the teaching platform AMBOSS. In total, in the evaluated examination performance in the discipline of rheumatology, the majority of students just about achieved the grade of "sufficient". Locations with freedom of instruction had significantly better grades; however, these differences had no relevance with respect to the complete state examination. The examination pressure on German medical students to learn for the examination discipline of rheumatology can be estimated as rather low. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie
#250
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,448
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.