↓ Skip to main content

New concepts in anaerobic digestion processes: recent advances and biological aspects

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
New concepts in anaerobic digestion processes: recent advances and biological aspects
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9039-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Castellano-Hinojosa, Caterina Armato, Clementina Pozo, Alejandro González-Martínez, Jesús González-López

Abstract

Waste treatment and the simultaneous production of energy have gained great interest in the world. In the last decades, scientific efforts have focused largely on improving and developing sustainable bioprocess solutions for energy recovery from challenging waste. Anaerobic digestion (AD) has been developed as a low-cost organic waste treatment technology with a simple setup and relatively limited investment and operating costs. Different technologies such as one-stage and two-stage AD have been developed. The viability and performance of these technologies have been extensively reported, showing the supremacy of two-stage AD in terms of overall energy recovery from biomass under different substrates, temperatures, and pH conditions. However, a comprehensive review of the advantages and disadvantages of these technologies is still lacking. Since microbial ecology is critical to developing successful AD, many studies have shown the structure and dynamics of archaeal and bacterial communities in this type of system. However, the role of Eukarya groups remains largely unknown to date. In this review, we provide a comprehensive review of the role, abundance, dynamics, and structure of archaeal, bacterial, and eukaryal communities during the AD process. The information provided could help researchers to select the adequate operational parameters to obtain the best performance and biogas production results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Student > Master 34 16%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 71 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 13%
Environmental Science 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Chemical Engineering 14 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 84 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,406,039
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,055
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,843
of 329,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#22
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.