↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput screening system for inhibitors of human Heat Shock Factor 2

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Stress and Chaperones, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
High-throughput screening system for inhibitors of human Heat Shock Factor 2
Published in
Cell Stress and Chaperones, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12192-015-0605-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Levi M. Smith, Dwipayan Bhattacharya, Daniel J. Williams, Ivan Dixon, Nicholas R. Powell, Tamara Y. Erkina, Alexandre M. Erkine

Abstract

Development of novel anti-cancer drug leads that target regulators of protein homeostasis is a formidable task in modern pharmacology. Finding specific inhibitors of human Heat Shock Factor 1 (hHSF1) has proven to be a challenging task, while screening for inhibitors of human Heat Shock Factor 2 (hHSF2) has never been described. We report the development of a novel system based on an in vivo cell growth restoration assay designed to identify specific inhibitors of human HSF2 in a high-throughput format. This system utilizes a humanized yeast strain in which the master regulator of molecular chaperone genes, yeast HSF, has been replaced with hHSF2 with no detrimental effect on cell growth. This replacement preserves the general regulatory patterns of genes encoding major molecular chaperones including Hsp70 and Hsp90. The controlled overexpression of hHSF2 creates a slow-growth phenotype, which is the basis of the growth restoration assay used for high-throughput screening. The phenotype is most robust when cells are cultured at 25 °C, while incubation at temperatures greater than 30 °C leads to compensation of the phenotype. Overexpression of hHSF2 causes overexpression of molecular chaperones which is a likely cause of the slowed growth. Our assay is characterized by two unique advantages. First, screening takes place in physiologically relevant, in vivo conditions. Second, hits in our screen will be of medically relevant potency, as compounds that completely inhibit hHSF2 function will further inhibit cell growth and therefore will not be scored as hits. This caveat biases our screening system for compounds capable of restoring hHSF2 activity to a physiologically normal level without completely inhibiting this essential system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#336
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,245
of 281,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.