Title |
Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11356-015-4723-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Piotr Tryjanowski, Piotr Skórka, Tim H. Sparks, Waldemar Biaduń, Tomasz Brauze, Tomasz Hetmański, Rafał Martyka, Piotr Indykiewicz, Łukasz Myczko, Przemysław Kunysz, Piotr Kawa, Stanisław Czyż, Paweł Czechowski, Michał Polakowski, Piotr Zduniak, Leszek Jerzak, Tomasz Janiszewski, Artur Goławski, Leszek Duduś, Jacek J. Nowakowski, Andrzej Wuczyński, Dariusz Wysocki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 221 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 51 | 23% |
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
Researcher | 23 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 52 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 37 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Unknown | 59 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,669
of 11,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,816
of 284,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#30
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.