↓ Skip to main content

Extrinsic Muscle Forces Affect Ankle Loading Before and After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Extrinsic Muscle Forces Affect Ankle Loading Before and After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4346-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tassos Natsakis, Josefien Burg, Greta Dereymaeker, Jos Vander Sloten, Ilse Jonkers

Abstract

Joint loading conditions have an effect on the development and management of ankle osteoarthritis and on aseptic loosening after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Apart from body weight, compressive forces induced by muscle action may affect joint loading. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of individual muscles on the intraarticular pressure distribution in the ankle. The purpose of this study was to measure intraarticular pressure distribution and, in particular, (1) to quantify the effect of individual muscle action on peak-pressure magnitude; and (2) to identify the location of the center of pressure in the weightbearing native ankles and ankles that had TAA. Peak pressure and intraarticular center of pressure were quantified during force alterations of four muscle groups (peronei, tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, and triceps surae) in 10 cadaveric feet. The pressure was measured with a pressure sensitive array before and after implantation of a three-component mobile-bearing TAA prosthesis. Linear mixed-effects models were calculated and the y-intercept (b0) and the slope (b1) of the regression were used to quantify the size of the effect. Mean maximum peak pressures of 2 MPa (± 2.6 MPa) and 6.2 MPa (± 3.6 MPa) were measured for the native and TAA joint respectively. The triceps surae greatly affect the magnitude of peak pressure in the native ankle (slope b1 = 0.174; p = 0.001) and TAA joint (slope b1 = 0.416; p = 0.001). Furthermore, the force of most muscles caused a posterior and lateral shift of the center of pressure in both conditions. Our results suggest that muscle force production has the potential to alter the pressure distribution in the native ankles and those with and TAA. Our study results help us to understand the effect of muscle forces on joint loading conditions which could be used in muscle training strategies and the design of better prosthetic components. Physical therapy or guided exercises may provide the potential to relieve areas in the joint that show signs of early osteoarthritis or reduce the contact stress on prosthetic components, potentially reducing the risk of TAA failure attributable to wear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 27%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Engineering 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,427,119
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,407
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,955
of 279,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#32
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.