↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 5,256)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
185 X users
facebook
140 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-4027-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas A. Cooper, Kelsey M. Scavo, Kyle J. Strickland, Natti Tipayamongkol, Jeffrey D. Nicholson, Dennis C. Bewyer, Kathleen A. Sluka

Abstract

Clinical observation suggests that hip abductor weakness is common in patients with low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study is to describe and compare the prevalence of hip abductor weakness in a clinical population with chronic non-specific LBP and a matched sample without LBP. One hundred fifty subjects with chronic non-specific LBP and a matched cohort of 75 control subjects were recruited. A standardized back and hip physical exam was performed. Specifically tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus strength were assessed with manual muscle testing. Functional assessment of the hip abductors was performed with assessment for the presence of the Trendelenburg sign. Palpation examination of the back, gluteal and hip region was performed to try and reproduce the subject's pain complaint. Friedman's test or Cochran's Q with post hoc comparisons adjusted for multiple comparisons was used to compare differences between healthy controls and people with chronic low back pain for both the affected and unaffected sides. Mann-Whitney U was used to compare differences in prevalence between groups. Hierarchical linear regression was used to identify predictors of LBP in this sample. Gluteus medius is weaker in people with LBP compared to controls or the unaffected side (Friedman's test, p < 0.001). The Trendelenburg sign is more prevalent in subjects with LBP than controls (Cochran's Q, p < 0.001). There is more palpation tenderness over the gluteals, greater trochanter, and paraspinals in people with low back pain compared to controls (Cochran's Q, p < 0.001). Hierarchical linear regression, with BMI as a covariate, demonstrated that gluteus medius weakness, low back regional tenderness, and male sex were predictive of LBP in this sample. Gluteus medius weakness and gluteal muscle tenderness are common symptoms in people with chronic non-specific LBP. Future investigations should validate these findings with quantitative measures as well as investigate the effect of gluteus medius strengthening in people with LBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 396 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 70 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 74 19%
Unknown 104 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 96 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 86 22%
Sports and Recreations 64 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 114 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#164,975
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#12
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,657
of 280,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.