↓ Skip to main content

Podoplanin: An emerging cancer biomarker and therapeutic target

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Podoplanin: An emerging cancer biomarker and therapeutic target
Published in
Cancer Science, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/cas.13580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harini Krishnan, Julie Rayes, Tomoyuki Miyashita, Genichiro Ishii, Edward P. Retzbach, Stephanie A. Sheehan, Ai Takemoto, Yao‐Wen Chang, Kazue Yoneda, Jun Asai, Lasse Jensen, Lushun Chalise, Atsushi Natsume, Gary S. Goldberg

Abstract

Podoplanin (PDPN) is a transmembrane receptor glycoprotein that is upregulated on transformed cells, cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and inflammatory macrophages that contribute to cancer progression. In particular, PDPN increases tumor cell clonal capacity, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, invasion, metastasis, and inflammation. Antibodies, CAR-T cells, biologics, and synthetic compounds that target PDPN can inhibit cancer progression and septic inflammation in preclinical models. This review describes recent advances in how PDPN may be used as a biomarker and therapeutic target for many types of cancer including glioma, squamous cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, and melanoma. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 48 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,703,710
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Science
#289
of 2,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,222
of 329,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Science
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.