↓ Skip to main content

Lumbar epidural lipomatosis is associated with visceral fat and metabolic disorders

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Lumbar epidural lipomatosis is associated with visceral fat and metabolic disorders
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5584-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shingo Morishita, Yoshiyasu Arai, Toshitaka Yoshii, Kenichiro Sakai, Takashi Hirai, Atsushi Okawa

Abstract

Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (LEL) is a condition characterized by excessive deposition of epidural fat in the spinal canal. Metabolic abnormalities may be associated with LEL, but few validated reports exist. Thus, we investigated the association between LEL and metabolic disorders in this study. A total of 218 patients who had neurological symptoms due to neural compression in the lumbar spinal canal were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans and blood tests. We evaluated the epidural fat, dural sac and spinal canal areas using MRI, and the visceral fat and subcutaneous fat areas using abdominal CT. We compared the patients' demographics and the radiological parameters between the LEL and non-LEL patients. There were 58 LEL patients and 160 non-LEL patients. The LEL group included more men than women. In the MRI measurement, the dural sac area was similar between the LEL and non-LEL patients; however, the epidural fat/spinal canal ratio was much greater in the LEL group. In the LEL patients, factors associated with metabolic disorders, such as visceral fat area, uric acid (UA) and insulin levels, were significantly greater, compared to the non-LEL patients. In the logistic regression analysis, UA and visceral fat area were the independent explanatory factors in the pathogenesis of LEL. LEL patients had significantly more visceral fat and increased levels of insulin, UA and ferritin, which are closely related with metabolic disorders. This study indicates that the increased epidural fat in the spinal canal seen in the LEL patients is associated with metabolic syndrome. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Unspecified 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,853,520
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,931
of 4,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,771
of 326,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#18
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.