↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke on Anticoagulation Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke on Anticoagulation Therapy
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00270-018-1902-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Černík, Daniel Šaňák, Petra Divišová, Martin Köcher, Filip Cihlář, Jana Zapletalová, Tomáš Veverka, Andrea Prcúchová, Dušan Ospalík, Marie Černá, Petra Janoušová, Michal Král, Tomáš Dorňák, Vojtěch Prášil, David Franc, Petr Kaňovský

Abstract

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (IS) can be performed also in patients on anticoagulation therapy (AT); however, sufficient and reliable data about safety and efficacy of MT are still missing. Thus, we aimed to compare these parameters between patients treated on AT and without AT. All consecutive IS patients treated with MT using stent retrievers were included in the retrospective analysis. Neurological deficit was scored using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90-day clinical outcome using modified Rankin scale with a score 0-2 for good outcome. Recanalization was rated using Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) was assessed according to the SITS-MOST criteria. Out of 703 patients treated with MT, 88 (12.5%) patients (46% males, mean age 75.5 ± 11.8 years) were on AT with an admission median NIHSS of 17 points. Recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 80% and complete (TICI 3) in 65% of patients on AT and in 80 and 65% of patients without AT (p-1.000). SICH after MT was detected in 9% of AT and 5% of non-AT patients (p-0.136). Good outcome was present in 36% of AT patients (p-0.03). AT patients with poor outcome had more frequently atrial fibrillation (93%, p-0.005), higher admission NIHSS (17, p-0.004) and higher rate of SICH (14.5%, p-0.047). MT seems to be safe also in patients on AT. Poor outcome may be related to higher admission NIHSS, higher rate of SICH and presence of atrial fibrillation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,981,465
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,513
of 2,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,764
of 474,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#40
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.