Title |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Space Science Reviews, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11214-015-0158-7 |
Authors |
R. T. James McAteer, Markus J. Aschwanden, Michaila Dimitropoulou, Manolis K. Georgoulis, Gunnar Pruessner, Laura Morales, Jack Ireland, Valentyna Abramenko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 19% |
Italy | 2 | 13% |
Portugal | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
Greece | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 44% |
Computer Science | 7 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,698,533
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#210
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,773
of 268,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.