↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments of dermatologic adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments of dermatologic adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00520-014-2564-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Chan, Michael C. Cameron, Benjamin Garden, Christine B. Boers-Doets, Katja Schindler, Joel B. Epstein, Jennifer Choi, Laura Beamer, Eric Roeland, Elvio G. Russi, René-Jean Bensadoun, Yi Ling Teo, Raymond J. Chan, Vivianne Shih, Jane Bryce, Judith Raber-Durlacher, Peter Arne Gerber, César O. Freytes, Bernardo Rapoport, Nicole LeBoeuf, Vincent Sibaud, Mario E. Lacouture

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,333,633
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,083
of 4,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,821
of 352,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#48
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.