You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098602 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre J M Rambaud, Clare L Ardern, Patricia Thoreux, Jean-Philippe Regnaux, Pascal Edouard |
| Abstract |
To describe the criteria used to guide clinical decision-making regarding when a patient is ready to return to running (RTR) after ACL reconstruction. Scoping review. The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library electronic databases. We also screened the reference lists of included studies and conducted forward citation tracking. Reported at least one criterion for permitting adult patients with primary ACL reconstruction to commence running postoperatively. 201 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and reported 205 time-based criteria for RTR. The median time from when RTR was permitted was 12 postoperative weeks (IQR=3.3, range 5-39 weeks). Fewer than one in five studies used additional clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for decision-making regarding RTR. Aside from time, the most frequently reported criteria for RTR were: full knee range of motion or >95% of the non-injured knee plus no pain or pain <2 on visual analogue scale; isometric extensor limb symmetry index (LSI)>70% plus extensor and flexor LSI>70%; and hop test LSI>70%. Fewer than one in five studies reported clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for RTR even though best evidence recommends performance-based criteria combined with time-based criteria to commence running activities following ACL reconstruction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 286 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 11% |
| United States | 29 | 10% |
| Spain | 28 | 10% |
| France | 19 | 7% |
| Canada | 19 | 7% |
| Japan | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 95 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 222 | 78% |
| Scientists | 38 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 518 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 14% |
| Other | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 98 | 19% |
| Unknown | 156 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 99 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 87 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Unknown | 176 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#207,683
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#465
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,644
of 339,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#17
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.