↓ Skip to main content

Mesenchymal stem cells: from experiment to clinic

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Mesenchymal stem cells: from experiment to clinic
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1755-1536-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R Otto, Nicholas A Wright

Abstract

There is currently much interest in adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their ability to differentiate into other cell types, and to partake in the anatomy and physiology of remote organs. It is now clear these cells may be purified from several organs in the body besides bone marrow. MSCs take part in wound healing by contributing to myofibroblast and possibly fibroblast populations, and may be involved in epithelial tissue regeneration in certain organs, although this remains more controversial. In this review, we examine the ability of MSCs to modulate liver, kidney, heart and intestinal repair, and we update their opposing qualities of being less immunogenic and therefore tolerated in a transplant situation, yet being able to contribute to xenograft models of human tumour formation in other contexts. However, such observations have not been replicated in the clinic. Recent studies showing the clinical safety of MSC in several pathologies are discussed. The possible opposing powers of MSC need careful understanding and control if their clinical potential is to be realised with long-term safety for patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 152 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Engineering 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#14,137,641
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#54
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,089
of 125,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.