↓ Skip to main content

Analogies, Moral Intuitions, and the Expertise Defence

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Analogies, Moral Intuitions, and the Expertise Defence
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13164-013-0163-2
Authors

Regina A. Rini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 11 50%
Psychology 4 18%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,758,791
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#328
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,061
of 200,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.