↓ Skip to main content

Tree-rings and people – different views on the 1540 Megadrought. Reply to Büntgen et al. 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tree-rings and people – different views on the 1540 Megadrought. Reply to Büntgen et al. 2015
Published in
Climatic Change, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1429-8
Authors

Christian Pfister, Oliver Wetter, Rudolf Brázdil, Petr Dobrovolný, Rüdiger Glaser, Jürg Luterbacher, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Eduardo Zorita, Maria-Joao Alcoforado, Mariano Barriendos, Ursula Bieber, Karl H. Burmeister, Chantal Camenisch, Antonio Contino, Uwe Grünewald, Jürgen Herget, Iso Himmelsbach, Thomas Labbé, Danuta Limanówka, Laurent Litzenburger, Andrea Kiss, Oldřich Kotyza, Øyvind Nordli, Kathleen Pribyl, Dag Retsö, Dirk Riemann, Christian Rohr, Werner Siegfried, Jean-Laurent Spring, Johan Söderberg, Sebastian Wagner, Johannes P. Werner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Estonia 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 44%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 32%
Environmental Science 4 16%
Engineering 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,391,091
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,257
of 5,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,002
of 267,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#28
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.