↓ Skip to main content

Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1445 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
925 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
Published in
Climate Dynamics, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1
Authors

J.-L. Dufresne, M.-A. Foujols, S. Denvil, A. Caubel, O. Marti, O. Aumont, Y. Balkanski, S. Bekki, H. Bellenger, R. Benshila, S. Bony, L. Bopp, P. Braconnot, P. Brockmann, P. Cadule, F. Cheruy, F. Codron, A. Cozic, D. Cugnet, N. de Noblet, J.-P. Duvel, C. Ethé, L. Fairhead, T. Fichefet, S. Flavoni, P. Friedlingstein, J.-Y. Grandpeix, L. Guez, E. Guilyardi, D. Hauglustaine, F. Hourdin, A. Idelkadi, J. Ghattas, S. Joussaume, M. Kageyama, G. Krinner, S. Labetoulle, A. Lahellec, M.-P. Lefebvre, F. Lefevre, C. Levy, Z. X. Li, J. Lloyd, F. Lott, G. Madec, M. Mancip, M. Marchand, S. Masson, Y. Meurdesoif, J. Mignot, I. Musat, S. Parouty, J. Polcher, C. Rio, M. Schulz, D. Swingedouw, S. Szopa, C. Talandier, P. Terray, N. Viovy, N. Vuichard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 925 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 896 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 222 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 23%
Student > Master 98 11%
Student > Bachelor 53 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 120 13%
Unknown 174 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 285 31%
Environmental Science 196 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 10%
Engineering 54 6%
Physics and Astronomy 15 2%
Other 58 6%
Unknown 222 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,162,306
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#186
of 5,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,259
of 209,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.