You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relating mesocarnivore relative abundance to anthropogenic land‐use with a hierarchical spatial count model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecography, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ecog.01179 |
| Authors |
Shawn M. Crimmins, Liza R. Walleser, Dan R. Hertel, Patrick C. McKann, Jason J. Rohweder, Wayne E. Thogmartin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#16,140,120
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,911
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,708
of 267,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.