| Title |
Yonder: Chronic pain, asthma, obstructive sleep apnoea, and methadone prescribing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x696029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Rashid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,347,749
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,815
of 4,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,770
of 340,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#68
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.