You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brachypodium as an emerging model for cereal–pathogen interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcv010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy L. Fitzgerald, Jonathan J. Powell, Katharina Schneebeli, M. Mandy Hsia, Donald M. Gardiner, Jennifer N. Bragg, C. Lynne McIntyre, John M. Manners, Mick Ayliffe, Michelle Watt, John P. Vogel, Robert J. Henry, Kemal Kazan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 24% |
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,408,457
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,920
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,708
of 277,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.