| Title |
Probiotics: Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial—PROSPECT: protocol for a feasibility randomized pilot trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-015-0013-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennie Johnstone, Maureen Meade, John Marshall, Daren K Heyland, Michael G Surette, Dawn ME Bowdish, Francois Lauzier, Lehana Thebane, Deborah J Cook, For the PROSPECT Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 188 | 80% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 189 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#12,731,752
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#513
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,771
of 267,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.