↓ Skip to main content

TheLeveillula mildews

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, October 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
TheLeveillula mildews
Published in
The Botanical Review, October 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02858418
Authors

Josef Palti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 43%
Engineering 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#75
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,976
of 13,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them