↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation (epi)genetic drivers of childhood brain tumours and the outlook for targeted therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Next-generation (epi)genetic drivers of childhood brain tumours and the outlook for targeted therapies
Published in
Lancet Oncology, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71206-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Arguably, nowhere has there been a greater advance in our understanding of biological mechanisms and potential translational targets during the next-generation sequencing era than in paediatric brain tumours. The so-called omics revolution, enabled by high-throughput sequencing, has empowered large consortia and independent groups alike to make major genetic discoveries, from dominant-negative histone mutations and hijacking of distal enhancer elements, to new oncogenic gene fusions and aberrantly active gene expression. Epigenetic deregulation has also been revealed as a common theme across several tumour subtypes. This Review focuses on key findings that have been transforming the landscape of paediatric neuro-oncology research and how these results are opening new avenues towards potential therapeutic translation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 19%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#11,471,584
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#4,970
of 7,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,253
of 306,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#69
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.