| Title |
Treat the Patient, Not the Pain: Using a Multidimensional Assessment Tool to Facilitate Patient-Centered Chronic Pain Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4456-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dale J. Langford, David J. Tauben, John A. Sturgeon, Daniel S. Godfrey, Mark D. Sullivan, Ardith Z. Doorenbos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#836,524
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#676
of 8,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,490
of 332,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#21
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.