| Title |
Prospective observational study of 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate therapy in 200 patients with advanced metastasized neuroendocrine tumours (NETs): feasibility and impact of a dosimetry-guided study protocol on outcome and toxicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-018-3945-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrike Garske-Román, Mattias Sandström, Katarzyna Fröss Baron, Lars Lundin, Per Hellman, Staffan Welin, Silvia Johansson, Tanweera Khan, Hans Lundqvist, Barbro Eriksson, Anders Sundin, Dan Granberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,418
of 3,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,285
of 348,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#30
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.