↓ Skip to main content

The impact of fluid balance on diagnosis, staging and prediction of mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
The impact of fluid balance on diagnosis, staging and prediction of mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40620-015-0211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Narat Srivali, Patompong Ungprasert, Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai, Kianoush Kashani

Abstract

Fluid accumulation may delay recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of fluid balance on the incidence, time of AKI diagnosis and predictive performance for outcomes of critically ill patients. This study included a cohort of 7696 adult ICU patients at Mayo Clinic Hospital in year 2011 with at least one serum creatinine (SCr) measured in ICU. AKI was defined based on SCr criterion for stage I of KDIGO definition. The AKI incidence and predictive performance for 60-day mortality was compared before and after SCr adjustment for fluid balance. AKI was detected in 1860 (24.2 %) before and 1947 (25.3 %) after fluid balance adjustment (P < 0.001). Patients with AKI both before and after SCr adjustment had significantly higher 60-day mortality in comparison with patients who did not develop AKI (OR 3.38; 95 % CI 2.84-4.02). The risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria after but not before SCr adjustment was significantly higher than patients without AKI (OR 2.00; 95 % CI 1.25-3.11). In contrast, the risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria before but not after SCr adjustment was similar to patients without AKI (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 0.48-2.50). The C-statistic for unadjusted and adjusted SCr to predict 60-day mortality were 0.68 and 0.70, respectively (P = 0.001). Our study found that SCr adjustment for fluid balance could result in a more accurate detection of AKI cases. We suggest using fluid balance adjustment for volume overload critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,115,851
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#561
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,110
of 269,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.