↓ Skip to main content

A novel radiographic scoring system for growth abnormalities and structural change in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the hip

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
A novel radiographic scoring system for growth abnormalities and structural change in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the hip
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00247-018-4136-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan C. Shelmerdine, Pier Luigi Di Paolo, Jasper F. M. M. Rieter, Clara Malattia, Laura Tanturri de Horatio, Karen Rosendahl

Abstract

Approximately 20-50% of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have hip involvement within 6 years of diagnosis. Scoring systems for hip-related radiographic changes are lacking. To examine precision of potential radiographic variables and to suggest a scoring system. We reviewed a set of 75 pelvic radiographs from 75 children with JIA hip involvement across two European centres. We assessed findings of (1) destructive change and (2) growth abnormality, according to a pre-defined scoring system. All radiographs were scored independently by two sets of radiologists. One set scored the radiographs a second time. We used kappa statistics to rate inter- and intra-observer variability. Assessment of erosions of the femoral head, femoral neck and the acetabulum showed moderate to good agreement for the same reader (kappa of 0.5-0.8). The inter-reader agreement was, however, low (kappa of 0.1-0.3). There was moderate to high agreement for the assessment of femoral head flattening (kappa of 0.6-0.7 for the same reader, 0.3-0.7 between readers). Joint space narrowing showed moderate to high agreement both within and between observers (kappa of 0.4-0.8). Femoral neck length and width measurements, the centrum-collum-diaphysis angle, and trochanteric-femoral head lengths were relatively precise, with 95% limits of agreement within 10-15% of the observer average. Several radiographic variables of destructive and growth abnormalities in children with hip JIA have reasonable reproducibility. We suggest that future studies on clinical validity focus on assessing only reproducible radiographic variables.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#12,782,275
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#984
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,823
of 326,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#20
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.