↓ Skip to main content

Against the rules: pressure induced transition from high to reduced order

Overview of attention for article published in Soft Matter, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Against the rules: pressure induced transition from high to reduced order
Published in
Soft Matter, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c8sm00212f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederik Neuhaus, Dennis Mueller, Radu Tanasescu, Cristina Stefaniu, Pierre-Léonard Zaffalon, Sandor Balog, Takashi Ishikawa, Renate Reiter, Gerald Brezesinski, Andreas Zumbuehl

Abstract

Envisioning the next generation of drug delivery nanocontainers requires more in-depth information on the fundamental physical forces at play in bilayer membranes. In order to achieve this, we combine chemical synthesis with physical-chemical analytical methods and probe the relationship between a molecular structure and its biophysical properties. With the aim of increasing the number of hydrogen bond donors compared to natural phospholipids, a phospholipid compound bearing urea moieties has been synthesized. The new molecules form interdigitated bilayers in aqueous dispersions and self-assemble at soft interfaces in thin layers with distinctive structural order. At lower temperatures, endothermic and exothermic transitions are observed during compression. The LC1 phase is dominated by an intermolecular hydrogen bond network of the urea moieties leading to a very high chain tilt of 52°. During compression and at higher temperatures, presumably this hydrogen bond network is broken allowing a much lower chain tilt of 35°. The extremely different monolayer thicknesses violate the two-dimensional Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Materials Science 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,335,770
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Soft Matter
#6,492
of 8,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,102
of 441,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Soft Matter
#640
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.