↓ Skip to main content

Artificial Lighting in the Industrialized World: Circadian Disruption and Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Artificial Lighting in the Industrialized World: Circadian Disruption and Breast Cancer
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10552-005-9001-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard G. Stevens

Abstract

Breast cancer risk is high in industrialized societies, and increases as developing countries become more Westernized. The reasons are poorly understood. One possibility is circadian disruption from aspects of modern life, in particular the increasing use of electric power to light the night, and provide a sun-free environment during the day inside buildings. Circadian disruption could lead to alterations in melatonin production and in changing the molecular time of the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). There is evidence in humans that the endogenous melatonin rhythm is stronger for persons in a bright-day environment than in a dim-day environment; and the light intensity necessary to suppress melatonin at night continues to decline as new experiments are done. Melatonin suppression can increase breast tumorigenesis in experimental animals, and altering the endogenous clock mechanism may have downstream effects on cell cycle regulatory genes pertinent to breast tissue development and susceptibility. Therefore, maintenance of a solar day-aligned circadian rhythm in endogenous melatonin and in clock gene expression by exposure to a bright day and a dark night, may be a worthy goal. However, exogenous administration of melatonin in an attempt to achieve this goal may have an untoward effect given that pharmacologic dosing with melatonin has been shown to phase shift humans depending on the time of day it's given. Exogenous melatonin may therefore contribute to circadian disruption rather than alleviate it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 35 27%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,622,512
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#164
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,672
of 67,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.