↓ Skip to main content

Expression of Estrogen Receptor-α and Survival in Advanced-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of Estrogen Receptor-α and Survival in Advanced-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Published in
Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2018
DOI 10.21873/anticanres.12470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marius Lund-Iversen, Helge Scott, Erik H Strøm, Noah Theiss, Odd Terje Brustugun, Bjørn H Grønberg

Abstract

The favorable prognosis of women with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to men might be explained by sex hormone-related mechanisms. We investigated whether this observation could be explained by the expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α) in tumor tissue. Archived, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tumor tissue samples were retrospectively analyzed for nuclear expression of ER-α with immunohistochemistry. Biopsies from 222 patients were analyzed. Twenty-three percent were ER-α positive. Fifty-four percent of the patients were men and 46% of the tumors were adenocarcinomas. One hundred-nine (49%) patients received pemetrexed and carboplatin and 113 (51%) received gemcitabine and carboplatin. Females with ER-α positive tumors who received PC had a substantial survival benefit over all other groups (20 vs. 4.6 months; p=0.003). ER-α is an independent prognostic factor in advanced NSCLC and might also be a predictive factor for response to pemetrexed/carboplatin in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,206,867
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
#113
of 4,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,859
of 345,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,041 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.