| Title |
Trends in use of neonatal CPAP: a population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine L Roberts, Tim Badgery-Parker, Charles S Algert, Jennifer R Bowen, Natasha Nassar |
| Abstract |
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used widely to provide respiratory support for neonates, and is often the first treatment choice in tertiary centres. Recent trials have demonstrated that CPAP reduces need for intubation and ventilation for infants born at 25-28 weeks gestation, and at > 32 weeks, in non-tertiary hospitals, CPAP reduces need for transfer to NICU. The aim of this study was to examine recent population trends in the use of neonatal continuous positive airway pressure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,907,825
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,276
of 2,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,428
of 138,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.