↓ Skip to main content

Are The Costs of Proposed Environmental Regulations Overestimated? Evidence from the CFC Phaseout

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental and Resource Economics, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are The Costs of Proposed Environmental Regulations Overestimated? Evidence from the CFC Phaseout
Published in
Environmental and Resource Economics, July 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008352022368
Authors

James K. Hammitt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 25%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Engineering 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#530
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,608
of 39,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them