↓ Skip to main content

Testing the accuracy of non-experts in biodiversity monitoring exercises using fern species richness in the Ecuadorian Amazon

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Testing the accuracy of non-experts in biodiversity monitoring exercises using fern species richness in the Ecuadorian Amazon
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0094-0
Authors

Johan A. Oldekop, Anthony J. Bebbington, Franka Berdel, Nathan K. Truelove, Thorsten Wiersberg, Richard F. Preziosi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belize 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 78 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 26%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,843
of 117,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.