↓ Skip to main content

Fate and Fortune in a Modern Fairy Tale: Louis Sachar's Holes

Overview of attention for article published in Children's Literature in Education, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Fate and Fortune in a Modern Fairy Tale: Louis Sachar's Holes
Published in
Children's Literature in Education, September 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1019682032315
Authors

Pat Pinsent

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 25%
Computer Science 1 13%
Linguistics 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Children's Literature in Education
#82
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,025
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Children's Literature in Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them