| Title |
Recommendations for oversight of nanobiotechnology: dynamic oversight for complex and convergent technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-011-0233-2 |
| Authors |
Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Susan M. Wolf, Jordan Paradise, Jennifer Kuzma, Ralph Hall, Efrosini Kokkoli, Leili Fatehi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,418,622
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#210
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,119
of 182,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.