↓ Skip to main content

Nanosized aptameric cavities imprinted on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles for high-throughput protein recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Nanosized aptameric cavities imprinted on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles for high-throughput protein recognition
Published in
Microchimica Acta, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00604-018-2745-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elham Shoghi, Seyede Zohreh Mirahmadi-Zare, Razieh Ghasemi, Matine Asghari, Mansour Poorebrahim, Mohammad-Hossein Nasr-Esfahani

Abstract

The authors introduce a new kind of surface artificial biomimetic receptor, referred to as aptameric imprinted polymer (AIP), for separation of biological macromolecules. Highly dispersed magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were coated with silica and then functionalized with methacrylate groups via silane chemistry. The aptamer was covalently immobilized on the surface of nanoparticles via a "thiol-ene" click reaction. Once the target analyte (bovine serum albumin; BSA) has bound to the aptamer, a polymer is created by 2-dimensional copolymerization of short-length poly(ethylene glycol) and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane. Following removal of BSA from the polymer, the AIP-MNPs presented here can selectively capture BSA with a specific absorbance (κ) as high as 65. When using this AIP, the recovery of BSA from spiked real biological samples is >97%, and the adsorption capacity is as high as 146 mg g-1. In our perception, this method has a wide scope in that it may be applied to the specific extraction of numerous other biomolecules. Graphical abstract Schematic presentation of the AIP (aptamer-imprinted polymer) introduced here. The surface of silica coated magnetic nanoparticles is modified with a polymer that is covalently modified with an aptamer against bovine serum albumin (BSA).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 21%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,485,225
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#1,039
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,400
of 330,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.