Title |
ddpcRquant: threshold determination for single channel droplet digital PCR experiments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00216-015-8773-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wim Trypsteen, Matthijs Vynck, Jan De Neve, Pawel Bonczkowski, Maja Kiselinova, Eva Malatinkova, Karen Vervisch, Olivier Thas, Linos Vandekerckhove, Ward De Spiegelaere |
Abstract |
Digital PCR is rapidly gaining interest in the field of molecular biology for absolute quantification of nucleic acids. However, the first generation of platforms still needs careful validation and requires a specific methodology for data analysis to distinguish negative from positive signals by defining a threshold value. The currently described methods to assess droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) are based on an underlying assumption that the fluorescent signal of droplets is normally distributed. We show that this normality assumption does not likely hold true for most ddPCR runs, resulting in an erroneous threshold. We suggest a methodology that does not make any assumptions about the distribution of the fluorescence readouts. A threshold is estimated by modelling the extreme values in the negative droplet population using extreme value theory. Furthermore, the method takes shifts in baseline fluorescence between samples into account. An R implementation of our method is available, allowing automated threshold determination for absolute ddPCR quantification using a single fluorescent reporter. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 27% |
Researcher | 22 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 8% |
Engineering | 10 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |