↓ Skip to main content

Overhearing the Planning of A Crime: Do Adults Outperform Children As Earwitnesses?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Overhearing the Planning of A Crime: Do Adults Outperform Children As Earwitnesses?
Published in
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11896-010-9076-5
Authors

Lisa Öhman, Anders Eriksson, Pär Anders Granhag

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 47%
Linguistics 3 16%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#171
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,974
of 87,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them