↓ Skip to main content

Adiposity as a cause of cardiovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Epidemiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adiposity as a cause of cardiovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
International Journal of Epidemiology, May 2015
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyv094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Hägg, Tove Fall, Alexander Ploner, Reedik Mägi, Krista Fischer, Harmen H M Draisma, Mart Kals, Paul S de Vries, Abbas Dehghan, Sara M Willems, Antti-Pekka Sarin, Kati Kristiansson, Marja-Liisa Nuotio, Aki S Havulinna, Renée F A G de Bruijn, M Arfan Ikram, Maris Kuningas, Bruno H Stricker, Oscar H Franco, Beben Benyamin, Christian Gieger, Alistair S Hall, Ville Huikari, Antti Jula, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Marika Kaakinen, Jaakko Kaprio, Michael Kobl, Massimo Mangino, Christopher P Nelson, Aarno Palotie, Nilesh J Samani, Tim D Spector, David P Strachan, Martin D Tobin, John B Whitfield, André G Uitterlinden, Veikko Salomaa, Ann-Christine Syvänen, Kari Kuulasmaa, Patrik K Magnusson, Tõnu Esko, Albert Hofman, Eco J C de Geus, Lars Lind, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Markus Perola, Alun Evans, Jean Ferrières, Jarmo Virtamo, Frank Kee, David-Alexandre Tregouet, Dominique Arveiler, Philippe Amouyel, Francesco Gianfagna, Paolo Brambilla, Samuli Ripatti, Cornelia M van Duijn, Andres Metspalu, Inga Prokopenko, Mark I McCarthy, Nancy L Pedersen, Erik Ingelsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 11 6%
Student > Master 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 53 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 62 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,351,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#1,186
of 6,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,213
of 283,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#24
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.