↓ Skip to main content

Treating Burkitt Lymphoma in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Treating Burkitt Lymphoma in Adults
Published in
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11899-015-0263-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Casulo, Jonathan Friedberg

Abstract

Burkitt lymphoma is an uncommon form of aggressive lymphoma affecting approximately 1200 patients per year in the USA. It is characterized by a translocation involving the MYC oncogene. Three subtypes of Burkitt lymphoma are recognized: the endemic form, occurring primarily in Africa and associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV); the sporadic form, representing less than 3 % of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL); and the immunodeficiency-associated form, occurring primarily in HIV-infected patients. Burkitt lymphoma appears histologically with a diffuse pattern of intermediate-sized monomorphic B cells, multiple nucleoli, a very high proliferative rate, and frequent mitotic figures. Recent advances in transcriptional profiling have improved the current molecular understanding of Burkitt lymphoma and have better characterized its mutational landscape. Most Burkitt lymphoma patients are cured with intensive treatment; however, prognosis is poor in elderly patients and those with relapsed disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Other 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,177,805
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#155
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,647
of 268,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.