↓ Skip to main content

Stars, Peripheral Scientists, and Equations: The Case of M. N. Saha

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Perspective, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Stars, Peripheral Scientists, and Equations: The Case of M. N. Saha
Published in
Physics in Perspective, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00016-015-0159-7
Authors

Deepanwita Dasgupta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,394,292
of 25,081,505 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Perspective
#81
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,347
of 272,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Perspective
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.