Early identification of prognostic superior characteristics in glioma patients such as Isocitrate dehydrogenase(IDH)-mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status is of great clinical importance. The study purpose was to investigate the non-invasive predictability of IDH-mutation status, MGMT promotor methylation, and differentiation of lower versus higher grade glioma (LGG vs. HGG) in newly-diagnosed patients employing relaxation-compensated multi-pool Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7.0 Tesla (7T).
Thirty-one newly-diagnosed glioma patients were included in this prospective study. CEST MRI was performed at a 7T whole-body scanner. Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE) and isolated amide proton transfer (APT, downfield NOE-suppressed APT=dns-APT) CEST signals (mean value and 90th signal percentile) were quantitatively investigated in the whole tumor area with regard to predictability of IDH-mutation, MGMT promotor methylation status, and differentiation of LGG vs. HGG. Statistics were performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Results were compared to advanced MRI methods (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) ROC/AUC analysis) obtained at 3T.
dns-APT CEST contrasts yielded highest AUCs in IDH-mutation status prediction (dns-APTmean=91.84%, p<0.01; dns-APT90=97.96%, p<0.001). Furthermore, dns-APT metrics enabled significant differentiation of LGG vs. HGG (AUC: dns-APTmean=0.78, p<0.05; dns-APT90=0.83, p<0.05). There was no significant difference regarding MGMT promotor methylation status at any contrast (p>0.05).
Relaxation-compensated multi-pool CEST MRI, particularly dns-APT imaging, enabled prediction of IDH-mutation status and differentiation of LGG vs. HGG and should therefore be considered as non-invasive MR biomarker in the diagnostic workup.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,404,229
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Oncology
#1,846
of 3,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,697
of 341,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Oncology
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
