↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Genus Potorous (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) Based on Allozyme Electrophoresis and Sequence Analysis of the Cytochrome b Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalian Evolution, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Genus Potorous (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) Based on Allozyme Electrophoresis and Sequence Analysis of the Cytochrome b Gene
Published in
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, September 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1027335907895
Authors

Elizabeth A. Sinclair, Michael Westerman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#289
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,309
of 28,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them