↓ Skip to main content

Association of neuropathic-like pain characteristics with clinical and radiographic features in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Association of neuropathic-like pain characteristics with clinical and radiographic features in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4125-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Hye Choi, Sang-Heon Lee, Hae-Rim Kim, Kyung-Ann Lee

Abstract

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, progressive, and inflammatory disorder and causes chronic back pain. It is not unusual for patients with AS to have symptoms similar to neuropathic pain. We aimed to investigate the neuropathic pain (NeP) component in patients with AS using the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) and to assess the relation between NeP and the disease characteristics of AS. A single-center prospective study was performed, including 105 patients. Patients with AS completed three questionnaires: PD-Q, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Patients were classified into three groups according to the PD-Q scores: nociceptive pain (NoP) (score ≤ 12), mixed pain (MP) (score 13-18), and NeP pain (score ≥ 19). Fifteen patients (14.2%) were classified into the NeP group, 22 (21.0%) in the MP group, and 68 (64.8%) in the NoP group. The questionnaires and clinical and radiographic findings were analyzed. Patients with NeP and MP scored worse on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI); BDI; modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score; pain-visual analog scale (VAS); and EQ-5L index and showed an increased prevalence of enthesitis and peripheral arthritis. There were no differences in objective inflammatory markers. PD-Q scores were positively correlated with pain-VAS, BASDAI, BDI, and inversely correlated with EQ-5D index. Age, BASDAI, presence of current enthesitis, and BDI score were independently associated with PD-Q scores. The findings showed that NeP component in AS was associated with age, high disease activity, presence of current enthesitis, and depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,665,177
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#865
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,363
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#13
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.